| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Infinitio Krystallos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
8
   |
Posted - 2012.06.30 20:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:I
Regardless, some of us choose exclusively activities with the least amount of risk - and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. This is usually what the carebear label designates: one who engages in low-risk activities.
Your argument is flawed on the get-go by the ASSUMPTION that is has to with risk/reward.
Can it not enter your tiny brains that it is just what the particular person LIKES DOING ?
Stop this idiotic argument and close this ump-teen hundreth Thread about this stupid supposition. |
Infinitio Krystallos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 20:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
2. What exactly is a reasonable amount of profit you should be allowed to make? What is the maximum and the minimum isk/hour that should be available when you perform said activities under you ideal risk/reward ratio you thought of when answering question .
Yet another flaw. I did not ASK or even TRY for or even KNOW ABOUT that Cruor BPC drop I received in a 3/10 DED site. |
Infinitio Krystallos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 21:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:Infinitio Krystallos wrote:Thor Kerrigan wrote:
2. What exactly is a reasonable amount of profit you should be allowed to make? What is the maximum and the minimum isk/hour that should be available when you perform said activities under you ideal risk/reward ratio you thought of when answering question .
Yet another flaw. I did not ASK or even TRY for or even KNOW ABOUT that Cruor BPC drop I received in a 3/10 DED site. How is your loss my flaw?
...and then you make no sense. Period.
Drunkpoasting is always a really bad idea. |
Infinitio Krystallos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 21:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
You state how the game is now. What I am interested is how a true carebear wants the game to be AND explain why he/she thinks it would be better.
And why do you want to know these things ? Where is the true intellectual drive ? |
Infinitio Krystallos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 21:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote: You are fine with highsec being 100% safe but with absolutely 0 rewards? .
You singularly win the worst poaster of the year for your circuolar nonsense. Get out. |
Infinitio Krystallos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2012.07.01 01:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:
EVE revolves around ships exploding.
Interesting viewpoint (and definitely OPINION) considering most outside media reporting on the game talk about how it revolves around the "unique player-driven Market". |
Infinitio Krystallos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2012.07.01 01:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
Delen Ormand wrote:ok with being ganked. They accept it as being part of the game. What they don't like is feeling like they're not wanted in the game and that one group of people is trying to drive them out. That's what they're facing now, and I really don't think that's either right or healthy for the game.
I showed a few Forum postings to my Therapist awhile back and she found that player attitude to be extrememly 'not normal' and actually tried to talk me out of playing.
It's a sandbox for people to do whatever they want. And the anti-miner crap is just that. Crap. The occasional surprise gank is no big deal and should be expected. But the pile-on has become so huge and childish I refuse to re-subscribe my 3rd and 4th tooons until CCP seriously does something about wat is absolutely the most negative player attitude on the net. Period.
Oh, and they barely got 40,000 online today...on a Saturday. And sorry but the Diablo 3 debut is now long in the past.
They had better say a few prayers for CCP cause the rats are indeed leaving over this screwed up attitude. 2 of my 4 accounts included.
And none of my toons have even been ganked in 18 months. But, the attitude is indeeed crippling. And should at this point be a huge financial worry to CCP. |
Infinitio Krystallos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2012.07.01 01:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Infinitio Krystallos wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:
EVE revolves around ships exploding.
Interesting viewpoint (and definitely OPINION) considering most outside media reporting on the game talk about how it revolves around the "unique player-driven Market". Said market also revolves around ships exploding. If ships didn't explode, ships & modules wouldn't need replacing, there would be no point to building stuff because nothing was exploding... Do you see where I'm going with this?
OK. Then they are both equally important. But thanks for revealing your myopic view in your poasting. |
Infinitio Krystallos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2012.07.01 01:51:00 -
[9] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Infinitio Krystallos wrote:Delen Ormand wrote:ok with being ganked. They accept it as being part of the game. What they don't like is feeling like they're not wanted in the game and that one group of people is trying to drive them out. That's what they're facing now, and I really don't think that's either right or healthy for the game. I showed a few Forum postings to my Therapist awhile back and she found that player attitude to be extrememly 'not normal' and actually tried to talk me out of playing. Taking a game so seriously & letting things happening in a game affect you is not normal & was most likely the reason she tried to talk you out of playing. Spaceships are serious business, but not that serious.
We pay RL money to play the game we want to play.
AND, you guys sure take the miner hatred seriously.
Oh, and you're just stupid in your claim to know what my Therapist thought. Get out. |
Infinitio Krystallos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2012.07.01 01:52:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Infinitio Krystallos wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Infinitio Krystallos wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:
EVE revolves around ships exploding.
Interesting viewpoint (and definitely OPINION) considering most outside media reporting on the game talk about how it revolves around the "unique player-driven Market". Said market also revolves around ships exploding. If ships didn't explode, ships & modules wouldn't need replacing, there would be no point to building stuff because nothing was exploding... Do you see where I'm going with this? OK. Then they are both equally important. But thanks for revealing your myopic view in your poasting. It's not short-sighted at all. Think of what would happen to your precious market over time if ships stopped exploding.
It's the childish attitude around it. Again, get out. |
| |
|